Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
According to Chapman, over 1.2 million mail-in ballots have been requested across the state, and 43% - or 556,000, have been returned.While she didn’t detail a specific incident, Chapman said there have been reports of threats aimed at the voting process throughout the state. She promised that her office has worked to investigate any threat made toward a free and fair election.
“Since I’ve been in office in January, we have constantly met with the FBI and Homeland Security just to talk through what the current threat landscape is and tools that we can give our counties to make sure that they have physical security protection as well as cyber security protection,” she said.
“So it’s been great to partner with both the federal and state law enforcement organizations. We are in constant communication with them and it’s a situation that we are monitoring,” Chapman added. -Lehigh Valley News
Really? Did you watch the disaster they called a debate? Fetterman has no business being in gov. He could have an R or an L by his name, and I'd say they same thing. It's nothing personal about him, just that his condition after his stroke has left him mentally disabled and obviously unfit for public office.My PA predictions:
-John Fetterman sen
Really? Did you watch the disaster they called a debate? Fetterman has no business being in gov. He could have an R or an L by his name, and I'd say they same thing. It's nothing personal about him, just that his condition after his stroke has left him mentally disabled and obviously unfit for public office.
Edited to add: not to mention the fact that he doesn't pay his own taxes, but would vote to increase your taxes. Lol
Not all women are in favor of abortion. Far from it.I don't think too many women will be voting for Oz.
Dr. Oz’s Appalling Position on Abortion Rights
In a critical debate, the Republican handed Democrat John Fetterman a powerful new tool in Pennsylvania’s Senate race.www.thenation.com
While totally ignoring any Rights of the baby they carry.They feel betrayed by the supreme court and the politicians who feel they don't deserve any rights as far as their own bodies are concerned
Of course. They have to look at it as just a clump of cells, not unlike a tumor, to be ok with killing it.Joe..........most of the women I know have shoved aside the "killing babies" way of looking at this
So protecting the baby from being killed is seen as removing ALL of their Rights? Yea, ok. whatever. lolThey feel betrayed by the supreme court and the politicians who feel they don't deserve any rights as far as their own bodies are concerned.
Are they too dumb to understand that abortion is nowhere to be found in the Constitution?I've talked to quite a few women who are registered repubs but who have said this was over the top and want anyone who agrees with the supremes gone.
Of course. They have to look at it as just a clump of cells, not unlike a tumor, to be ok with killing it.
So protecting the baby from being killed is seen as removing ALL of their Rights? Yea, ok. whatever. lol
Are they too dumb to understand that abortion is nowhere to be found in the Constitution?
Joe..........most of the women I know have shoved aside the "killing babies" way of looking at this and are, instead, focusing on their rights as a human being to decide their own medical care and what goes on with their own bodies.
Do you think those same women believe in the right to refuse an mRNA injection that is now well-documented as causing immunosuppression, cancer, blood clots, strokes, nerve damage, infertility, myocarditis, and death?
I'm not against women having abortions up to a point. Late term and post birth is, however, outright murder. Forced injections is also outright murder. I also prefer things to be decided at the state level than the national level. People can move from one state to another. But when power is highly centralized and DC screws up, the entire nation is damaged.BF...........the women I have talked to are all mothers. In some cases, grandmothers. They have carried babies in their bodies They have given birth. I sure haven't and neither have you. We don't know what a pregnant woman actually goes through, especially one who has been raped or who is experiencing complications that could result in a disastrous life or death situation.
Ok, but you were the who brought it up and labeled it as being the most important election issue we have.Not going to continue talking about the abortion issue here. What someone else believes about any election issue is their own business, and they have every right to believe in what they believe in, whether you, I or anyone one else agrees with their beliefs or not.
Unless there is cheating going on, we should know before the 10th.Election day is Nov 8th. In PA we should know by the 10th (at the latest) who won. I'll stick to my predictions and get back to you once the results are in.
You gave me one too! Abortion the most important issue on most peoples minds? LolBTW - You gave me a good laugh. Thanks!!
The pregnancies you describe, mothers life in danger and those resulting from rape, are exceedingly rare, as the overwhelming majority are nothing but "abortions of convenience".We don't know what a pregnant woman actually goes through, especially one who has been raped or who is experiencing complications that could result in a disastrous life or death situation.
Those Justices did not force the abortion lovers to pursue the case. They coulda been happily killing babies for 15 weeks, but that wasn't good enough for 'em.They (and the rest of us) were betrayed by several lying, conniving, religious con artists who lied their way on to the supreme court so they could impose their religious & political views on the entire country. And the will of the majority be dammed.
How 'bout just change the Constitution in order make abortion be covered by it?As to Roe - let the people decide. Put it to a national vote. Make whatever the outcome the law of the land.
Anyone who votes D at this point is brainwashed.I've been a big critic of Trump, and I still am. But, given all that has happened over the past two years, I think anyone who votes Democrat is strongly lacking awareness.
It is because they are globalists.Not a single elected Democrat (that I'm aware of) has stood up against this holocaust and the Davos agenda.
I'll agree with that.Anyone who votes D at this point is brainwashed.
The Democratic voters themselves? I'm not so sure that they are actual globalists, I think they don't understand who hijacked the executive branch. The UN/ WEF/ Royal Family / Rockefellers / Rothschilds / Gates run the White House. These people are international gangsters. More importantly they are anti-human( except for themselves).It is because they are globalists.
Trump's fans are populist-nationalists. Trump himself is highly compromised and mixed up with the international cabal. Never forget Operation Warp Speed. His boi Kushner was just over there at Davos in Desert. We really need someone more like DeSantis.Trump, like him or not, is a popular nationalist.
No, they are just fools with self-inflicted brain damage.The Democratic voters themselves?
Trump is on-record as being anti vax mandate.Trump's fans are populist-nationalists. Trump himself is highly compromised and highly mixed up with the international cabal. Never forget Operation Warp Speed. His boi Kushner was just over there at Davos in Desert. We really need someone like DeSantis or Lake.
I'm willing to give him a pass on that, as no man is perfect.Trump absolutely lied about and promoted the injections and it's not excusable.
This is the one aspect of Trump I can not resolveTrump absolutely lied about and promoted the injections and it's not excusable.
DeSantis 2024!
i'm not certain what to think about this one here JKReally? Did you watch the disaster they called a debate? Fetterman has no business being in gov. He could have an R or an L by his name, and I'd say they same thing. It's nothing personal about him, just that his condition after his stroke has left him mentally disabled and obviously unfit for public office.
Edited to add: not to mention the fact that he doesn't pay his own taxes, but would vote to increase your taxes. Lol
Perhaps I have been projecting super human qualities on Trump. Its easy to fall into the trap that he is a super hero who will save us. When he speaks I see a man who is totally sincere. One is working very hard to try and fight the deep state. I don't think that energy and passion can be faked. So was he deceived on the vaccine? Does he know something we don't know? Are we wrong about how bad the vaccine is? I have to be able to fit this all together.Trump is a business man, and a very good one. A good business man should usually is a good politician, if he's honest. And I believe trump is, for the most part. He is somewhat dumbass about medical issues, and yeah, he totally blew this scamdemic. Look, however, at who was advising him, and the general public tv tranced ignorance of the reality of viruses. Still would rather have him up there than that moron up there now.
And Fetterstein, or perhaps FrankenFetter appears to be another braindead lib kneeling to the DS.
I think at some point Trump has to be held accountable for the advisors he appointed, and for taking their advice. Just for example, there is no way that Ron Paul would have allowed Operation Warp Speed, and there is no way Ron Paul would have personally promoted the crap. This is because Ron Paul understands government should be highly limited, and that using tax funds to sponsor mass vaccination programs is corrupt and beyond the scope of legitimate government.Trump is a business man, and a very good one. A good business man should usually is a good politician, if he's honest. And I believe trump is, for the most part. He is somewhat dumbass about medical issues, and yeah, he totally blew this scamdemic. Look, however, at who was advising him, and the general public tv tranced ignorance of the reality of viruses. Still would rather have him up there than that moron up there now.
And Fetterstein, or perhaps FrankenFetter appears to be another braindead lib kneeling to the DS.
Again, he did not bring the case. The looney leftist baby killers did because they weren't happy with only being able to kill babies for the first 15 weeks of pregnancy.Here's a quick video that can probably explain this a bit better than me. It shows how Alito lied through his teeth so he could get onto the supreme court to overturn Roe.
I was trying to be nice, but yea, I agree with you. loli don't care what happens to him, he should be mocked off the stage, as should joe
He's a human, and just like the rest of us, he is less than perfect and subject to make mistakes.Perhaps I have been projecting super human qualities on Trump. Its easy to fall into the trap that he is a super hero who will save us.
At least you have recognized it!Perhaps I have been projecting super human qualities on Trump.
Are you sure?I see a man who is totally sincere.
Absolutely not. We've verified this 6 ways from Sunday. From the testimony of career doctors like Ryan Cole, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Sucharit Bhakdi, and many others, to official excess mortality rates rising on the exact weeks shots and boosters were rolled out. It's proven. These are dangerous. On top of all that, I personally know four vaccine-injured people.Are we wrong about how bad the vaccine is?
the women I have talked to are all mothers. In some cases, grandmothers. They have carried babies in their bodies They have given birth.
@searcher , seeing as you seem to have the inside line on what women think about this whole Roe issue, can you please help me understand exactly what it is that they want relative to abortions?They are angry because a few lying, religious maniacs want to tell them what they can or can't do with their own bodies and their own health care. And I don't blame them.
@searcher , seeing as you seem to have the inside line on what women think about this whole Roe issue, can you please help me understand exactly what it is that they want relative to abortions?
As in, if they are allowed under the law, how many weeks into a pregnancy is acceptable as a limit? Or do they (the ones you say you speak for) want it as an option all the up to the day of delivery?
Ie: where is the line that they can be happy with?
They already had the ability to abort in most States up to almost 4 Months. Is that not long enough to decide if they wanted to keep their baby or not? Why was that not good enough?
After all, they are the ones who made the challenge in court, but now they don't want to abide by the decision they got.
Why did they not just leave well enough alone, and be happy with the (imho) very generous amount of time to legally have an abortion? Instead, they took a gamble, and lost.
Help me to understand exactly what they are fighting for.
Maybe I haven't explained what I was saying in a way that could easily be understood or you're taking what I've said way out of context. Who knows?
The women I've talked to (and a lot of men) are pissed off at what they consider to be a betrayal of the supreme court concerning their right to choose what goes on with their own personal bodies and their own personal health care. Their main thing is "What gives them the right to decide what I can or can't do with my body?"
Forget abortion for a minute. Could be the jab. Could be anything else. Alot of people, both men and women, have expressed this to me. A small minority of people who were not elected but were appointed by congress, after they lied to that same congress to secure their appointments, have decided what other human beings could or could not do with their own bodies.
Supposed the supreme court decided that everyone should get the jab. Would you go along with that decision? Supposed they came up with a decision that people with certain illnesses should be denied medical care. Would you go along with that? This is what I'm getting at.
I know you enjoy debating / arguing with people online. You're actually good at it (lol.) But the decision to overturn Roe really isn't so much about abortion as it is about a handful for human beings trying to control what the vast majority of people can or can't do concerning their own bodies and health care. Pretty soon it could be about who lives or who dies. Who can or can't elect presidents. Get where I'm going here? Hope I've made my point of view a bit clearer.
I think it's time to get rid of the supreme court that we have today. No more presidential picks, congressional hearings, lifetime appointments. Let anyone who wants to be on the supreme court run for office and be elected by the people of the country. No more than two four-year terms. This would end all the bullshit going on with them.
BTW..........congrats on making the IAPA&DHOF.
Most of the party has been in Destroy America mode ever since the Civil War..but having another D in office is obviously seen by the left as being more important than the well being of the nation.
You explained that you talk with lots of women about the issue.Maybe I haven't explained what I was saying in a way that could easily be understood or you're taking what I've said way out of context. Who knows?
They did rule on that.Forget abortion for a minute. Could be the jab.
No, but my decision to refrain would not affect any other person, as it is on the record that the vax does not prevent transmission of the virus.Supposed the supreme court decided that everyone should get the jab. Would you go along with that decision?
I try to be.I know you enjoy debating / arguing with people online. You're actually good at it (lol.)
We already have court cases about that.Pretty soon it could be about who lives or who dies
All that would do is to ensure that our nation would not last very long.I think it's time to get rid of the supreme court that we have today. No more presidential picks, congressional hearings, lifetime appointments. Let anyone who wants to be on the supreme court run for office and be elected by the people of the country. No more than two four-year terms. This would end all the bullshit going on with them.
You explained that you talk with lots of women about the issue.
My question was, what exactly do they want, when it comes to abortion?
You said a lot, but did not answer my question.
They had 15 weeks but challenged it because they were not satisfied with that.
Would 16 weeks be enough?
Maybe 20?
Help me out here. I want to understand how long would be acceptable to them, because I have asked this before, but have never received a clear answer.
Or are no limits, their goal?
They did rule on that.
No, but my decision to refrain would not affect any other person, as it is on the record that the vax does not prevent transmission of the virus.
However, when a baby is aborted, its life is cut short and our Founding Docs guarantee the Right to ones life.
I try to be.
....and yes, I do enjoy a good debate. Lol
We already have court cases about that.
Ie: everyone on death row stood before a court and had their Right to their life be decided.
All that would do is to ensure that our nation would not last very long.
It sounds as though you are espousing something very similar to direct democracy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?