India to repatriate some gold?

[pmbug]

A technocrat-turned-public interest litigant, Raghunath Shankar Kelkar, has challenged the Reserve Bank of India's move to deposit abroad 265.49 tonnes of gold out of its total stock of 557.75 tonnes by filing a public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court and has demanded that the precious metal be brought back into the country according to the provisions of the law.

Kelkar, 56, who used to manufacture computers, has filed the petition as he found that the move by the central bank contradicts Section 33(5) of Reserve Bank of India Act of 1934, which stipulates that 85 per cent of the bank's gold reserves should be kept in India.

The Bombay High Court bench, comprising D.D. Sinha and V.K. Tahilramani, heard the petition recently. The court noted that no one appeared for the RBI. The order stated, "Considering the issue involved in the present public interest lititation, we grant one opportunity to the RBI to put an appearance through its lawyer on the next day of hearing and assist the court."

Kelkar filed the petition on March 1. He said that he had sent three notices of the issue to the RBI, eliciting no reply. He has made the Government of India another respondent in this case. Kelkar is an avid RBI watcher.

He read the 17th half yearly report of RBI on management of foreign exchange reserves, in which the bank has said, "The Reserve Bank held 557.75 tonnes of gold, forming about 9.2 per cent of the total foreign exchange reserves. Of these 265.49 tonnes are held abroad in deposits or safe custody with the Bank of England and the Bank for International Settlements."

He said that the RBI move was in violation of the legal provision as the bank had put 46 per cent of its gold reserves out of the country.

The reason given for the action is that of safe custody. "Does the RBI mean that gold is unsafe in India? Does the RBI think that Indian security forces are incapable of guarding the gold treasure of the country?" Kelkar asked.

He raised a question in the petition: "In case there is a war between India and England in future, will our gold held by Bank of England be safe?"

He has made three demands in the petition: that the RBI be ordered to transfer the gold reserves of the country from the possession of the Bank of England and Bank for International Settlements to its own possession within the country; that until the final disposal of the case, the bank not be allowed to take any more gold out of the country; and that a detailed report be filed as to which bank officers are responsible for the breach of Section 33(5) of RBI Act.
...

http://gata.org/node/11348

Mr. Raghunath Shankar Kelkar, I salute you. :beer:

That takes some moxy.

 

[ancona]

I never did understand why any sovereign nation would keep their gold anywhere besides within their own freaking borders.

 

[DSAbug]

I never did understand why any sovereign nation would keep their gold anywhere besides within their own freaking borders.

Well.. I think India's relationship with Pakistan is part of it. It's also not like India doesn't have enough gold.

Think of it this way... You need to buy weapons during a war. You can risk sending your gold by ship or plane and risk it getting shot down/sunk, or you can put your gold with the world's superpower(financial and military) during times of peace. In the event you need to sell to preserve your own safety, this takes away some risk. It's a way of spreading your risk.

The only reason why we are even having this discussion is because the USA has ruined some of that trust we had with other nations.

 

[ancona]

Derek,
Wouldn't you think that with all the recent revelations about the banks and their "shitty deals" other countries would balk at allowing anyone such as JPM to have custody of their frigging gold?!?!

It astounds me when I read about the possibility of foreign gold being hypothecated and lent out.

 

[DSAbug]

Derek,
Wouldn't you think that with all the recent revelations about the banks and their "shitty deals" other countries would balk at allowing anyone such as JPM to have custody of their frigging gold?!?!

It astounds me when I read about the possibility of foreign gold being hypothecated and lent out.

At this point, there are obviously great risks to having your gold stored at a US financial institution.

All I was doing with my comments was explaining why it mades sense to have your gold stored in a foreign nation if you were a central bank.