Iran

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

There is no way Trump can ever allow Iran to have nuclear weapons. There is no way he can leave office with Iran ever having even the faint hope of having nuclear weapons. Why is Iran so dangerous "besides the fact its ran but nut jobs who want to kill Americans and Jews "just because"?

Iran, fueled by endless oil income, possesses a 100 % Domestic pipeline in the production of both the weapons, delivery systems, and scientific knowledge. They have huge uranium reserves along with nuclear reactors capable of producing plutonium, plutonium of course is whats needed to make far more destructive 2 stage "H bombs". And with it the ability to deliver warheads in the megaton range. The kind that make thee Hiroshima bomb look like a firecracker.

And with it the delivery systems to terrorize the entire region. The IRBM's "Intermediate range ballistic missiles" along with the short range. Advanced cruise missiles seeing that the Ukraine Mob sold them Soviet cruise missiles when the Union fell apart. Eventually they will put another stage on their rockets and make ICBM's putting America in the cross hairs and with it MIRVed warhead Bus's with decoys that will make interception problematic and each missile able to deliver multiple warheads. Maybe one day SLBM's from submarines. And had Trump and the Jews not attacked these shits it all would have happened quickly because they were just biding their time thinking one last shake down on the western idiots for much needed cash and then we'll do that first test, which would then send Alice down the rabbit hole. Its the same formula used by India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, South Africa....ect

But Iran would be worse and not just because the ones with the fingers on the buttons were the same vicious bastards who mowed down 40,000 protesters with heavy machine guns. That and a generation or two before sent barefoot children to the land of 72 virgins by sending them thru Iraqi minefields to clear paths for the infantry. But Iran having nukes would terrify the region so much it would have a rippled effect causing many other countries to want nukes of their own. Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Caucuses, and others. This is 80yo technology after all and within reach of anyone who wants to spend the cash.

All of these tribal shitholes full of ancient hatreds armed with terrible weapons with flight times from each other in the minutes and seconds and none really know how to manage them and/or building safe and effective chains of command. Even we and the Reds have almost blown the world to kingdom come in the past over a flight of migrating geese.
 
Too late, he has made a nuke weapon inevitable, Iran now knows if it ever to be free, it must have a nuke weapon. Do you think that pussy Trump would have ever tried N. Korea or Pakistan like this...beg, borrow or steal, Iran must have nuclear weapons.
 
Fatrat said:
Too late, he has made a nuke weapon inevitable, Iran now knows if it ever to be free, it must have a nuke weapon. Do you think that pussy Trump would have ever tried N. Korea or Pakistan like this...beg, borrow or steal, Iran must have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
It's all Trump's fault. Iran is as innocent as a newborn baby.
 
Fatrat said:
Too late, he has made a nuke weapon inevitable, Iran now knows if it ever to be free, it must have a nuke weapon. Do you think that pussy Trump would have ever tried N. Korea or Pakistan like this...beg, borrow or steal, Iran must have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
"Freedom" and "Iran".

Thats precious.
 
Who is that guy, an AI bot?

...we're seeing a lot of them, now. Over at Quinn's Burning Platform...he's reposting a blog by an obvious AI entity. Not sure why...perhaps to highlight that they're out there? He can't not know it.

But this guy keeps on spewing the kool-aid for the worshippers to lap up...and I'm not having it. Some oil's getting through. Far less than was normal, and at this point, we (or responsible governments) need to replenish our/their reserves.
 
Casey Jones said:
Who is that guy, an AI bot?
Click to expand...

Nah, he's the real deal. Guy cracks me up with some of his posts. Posting the funnier ones for a laugh. Way too many serious peeps - gotta laugh once in a while.

Captain Singh, FICArb — Maritime Professional and Social Media Presence​

Captain Singh, FICArb, is a UK Master Mariner with over 25 years of command experience in the shipping industry www.twitterviewer.io. The “FICArb” designation refers to his Fellowship of the Institute of Chartered Arbitrators, indicating expertise in maritime dispute resolution and arbitration.

He is active on social media under the handle @captsingh, where he shares maritime news, travel updates, and commentary on global shipping issues www.twitterviewer.io. His content often focuses on:

  • Maritime and energy crises, such as the Hormuz Strait disruptions and their impact on global supply chains.
  • Seafarer welfare, highlighting the challenges faced by crews stranded in conflict zones.
  • Geopolitical and economic developments affecting shipping, including ceasefire negotiations and market risks.
Captain Singh also identifies as a nautical consultant in Singapore and a globetrotter at heart, with a strong interest in maritime history and travel www.twitterviewer.io. His posts are aimed at both maritime professionals and the general public, blending operational insights with human-interest stories about the seafaring community.

In summary, Captain Singh, FICArb, is a seasoned shipping captain and maritime expert who uses his platform to inform, advocate for seafarers, and connect the shipping industry with broader geopolitical and economic narratives.
 
searcher said:
Click to expand...

Could be an underground Island or reef. For instance its widely believed, or at least one of the theories, that the Edmund Fitzgerald struck a underwater reef after the storm blew her off course and the crew didn't realize the drift they were pushed on by the winds and sea's. In fact I think this was verified by underwater camera that this underwater shoal, "The 6 Fathom shoal", was not the cause of the sinking tho it was possible dues to a number of reasons. The actual cause was finally agreed upon as overloading, poor hatch seals that added even more weight to the ship, and poor decision making by the Capt. which the company naturally wanted to cover up.

But a 6'th fathom shoal is 36' deep jutting up in 550' water in Lake Superior and such structures are even far more common in the oceans or the gulfs. The Persian Gulf is loaded with very shallow shoals and Islands. 2/3rds of it is 75' or shallower making it a very difficult trek for a super-tanker.
 
SilverStacker said:
Could be an underground Island or reef. For instance its widely believed, or at least one of the theories, that the Edmund Fitzgerald struck a underwater reef after the storm blew her off course and the crew didn't realize the drift they were pushed on by the winds and sea's. In fact I think this was verified by underwater camera that this underwater shoal, "The 6 Fathom shoal", was not the cause of the sinking tho it was possible dues to a number of reasons. The actual cause was finally agreed upon as overloading, poor hatch seals that added even more weight to the ship, and poor decision making by the Capt. which the company naturally wanted to cover up.
Click to expand...
The charts used by the Fitz were also found to be inaccurate. They were considerable distance off from where they believed they were.

And the shoal was nowhere near the normal route of freighters, so it wasn't a well-known navigation track.

As to this...shipwreck, maybe. Or pilings dropped down.

Or just that again, charts are inaccurate. The Toll Route is far from what had been the navigation channel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom