Yup.
Because it's all manipulated. And controlled by the algos.
The algos see buzzwords in the nooze feeds, they react by dumping or panic-buying, as programmed.
It's so GD obvious, it's apparent they don't even care that we know, anymore.
Iran
- Thread starter Goldhedge
- Start date
Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).
Because it's all manipulated. And controlled by the algos.
The algos see buzzwords in the nooze feeds, they react by dumping or panic-buying, as programmed.
It's so GD obvious, it's apparent they don't even care that we know, anymore.
It's been $3.65 for awhile now, but I saw $3.56 last night.
If things were even half as bad as the detractors would have us believe, gas would be going up. Not staying the same or going slightly lower.
We had over $5 gas during Biden's term and it was downplayed.
Now we got actual shooting going on over there and gas is under $4?
Seems like it's being blown out of proportion to me.
- Messages
- 45,436
- Reaction score
- 7,681
- Points
- 288
Xi Signals Defiance as U.S. Threatens Sanctions for Iran Support
While Xi won’t cut ties with Tehran, Beijing could decide to further reduce purchases of Iranian oil or keep income from such transactions locked in Chinese banks.
www.supplychainbrain.com
That's the same logic as, "The stawk markets are going up, so everything must be AWESOME!!"
That overlooks a few (a lot of) critical factors.
Does Trump even WANT to. Everything I see, suggests he's smashing things for the sheer brain-stem joy of it.
Yea, like the factor of Iran having nukes.
....and yea, I know the, "but they been sayin' that for years", trope.
The IAEA said they were 6 months to at most a year from having them. I don't know 'bout you, but in my World, 6 months from having nukes is the definition of "imminent".
They've been six months from having them for forty years.
About as long as the Republicans were going to balance the "next" budget.
About as long as the Republicans were going to balance the "next" budget.
It was never "they are 6 months from having a nuke". It was "they are working towards it".
The IAEA draws a sharp distinction between having the necessary raw materials and actually building a deployable weapon:
The Fissile Material (Days to Weeks away): According to the IAEA's baseline metrics before recent military strikes, Iran's "breakout time"—the time needed to enrich its existing 60% uranium stockpile to the 90% weapons-grade threshold—was close to zero, likely a matter of days or a week.
The Weaponization Process (Months to a Year away):
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi explicitly denied that Iran was "days or weeks away from building a bomb". The IAEA reports that Iran still lacks a viable nuclear weapon design, a tested explosive detonation system, and the metallurgy experience required to cast uranium into a missile warhead. Security analysts estimate this weaponization process would take nine months to a full year
They've never been so close.
Trump moved when he did because there wasn't 6 months to year to be able to wait.
"That novel coronavirus represents an existential threat towards all humanity. And with Project Warp Speed, we can beat it. But none of us are safe unless all of us are vaccinated."
How many of their lies am I expected to believe?
How many of their lies am I expected to believe?
I'm just looking at what the most recent IAEA report said.
It would explain why Trump didn't wait until after the election to do this. He didn't think we had a year to put it off.
A lotta peeps against all of it, use the IAEA report to say they don't have one. Yes currently that is true, but they skip the "6 months to a year" part of the report.
I have no way of knowing if its true or not, but it's all we have to go by.
- Messages
- 22,206
- Reaction score
- 12,576
- Points
- 288
Cover the current situation in Iran & deep state
01:38 "Iran won" — and the peace treaty that isn't coming
05:26 Scott Bessent's financial D-Day
06:28 Saudi, Turkey, Pakistan — and the Abraham Accords
09:10 The casualty numbers nobody is showing you
11:50 Shutting the money off
14:04 Was it already a done deal?
16:57 Cutting bait: the men above the senior managers
19:18 Arrogance, Comey, and why truth is easier
21:12 Which CCP are we talking about?
22:31 The ARC — America, Russia, China
26:36 Lavrov at the Vatican
28:53 Andy Burnham and the missile blueprints
31:59 Why Ireland is the laboratory
37:03 Q, and the technologies they kept from us
39:09 How do you tell everybody?
42:46 The clean-up war after this war
45:12 The apocalypse optimist
Iran's Regime Isn't Fighting Anymore, They're Negotiating EXILE
00:00 The embassy staff are going back01:38 "Iran won" — and the peace treaty that isn't coming
05:26 Scott Bessent's financial D-Day
06:28 Saudi, Turkey, Pakistan — and the Abraham Accords
09:10 The casualty numbers nobody is showing you
11:50 Shutting the money off
14:04 Was it already a done deal?
16:57 Cutting bait: the men above the senior managers
19:18 Arrogance, Comey, and why truth is easier
21:12 Which CCP are we talking about?
22:31 The ARC — America, Russia, China
26:36 Lavrov at the Vatican
28:53 Andy Burnham and the missile blueprints
31:59 Why Ireland is the laboratory
37:03 Q, and the technologies they kept from us
39:09 How do you tell everybody?
42:46 The clean-up war after this war
45:12 The apocalypse optimist