Stock market neuromancers

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
14,291
Reaction score
4,511
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
'Real' trading in U.S. markets is down to 16 percent; the rest is machines

Trading by "real" investors is taking up the smallest share of US stock market volumes in more than a decade, according to a recent study.

The findings highlight how US trading activity is increasingly being fuelled by fast turnover of shares by independent firms and the market-making desks of brokerages, many using high-frequency trading engines.

Though many argue that such trading lowers costs by narrowing spreads, critics insist that it makes it more difficult for institutional investors to trade larger positions, in turn fuelling a rise in the use of off-exchange "dark pools" and more complex algorithmic trading techniques.

The proportion of US trading activity represented by buy and sell orders from mutual funds, hedge funds, pensions, and brokerages, referred to as "real money" or institutional investors, accounted for just 16 per cent of total market volume in the form of buying, and 13 per cent via selling in the final quarter of last year, according to analysis by Morgan Stanley's Quantitative and Derivative Strategies group.

That has fallen from an average of 27 per cent for institutional buys from 2001 to 2006, and 20 per cent for sells over the same period. The highs were at the beginning of 2001, as far back as Morgan Stanley's analysis goes, when buys and sells were some 35 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively.

Morgan Stanley's analysts, Charles Crow and Simon Emrich, used 13-F filings, which are public disclosures of position changes by institutions, to measure the proportions.
...

More: http://gata.org/node/11288
 
Back
Top Bottom