The Epstein Files

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!


Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov:

“The topic of Epstein is to do with exposing the collective West and what is called The Deep State”

“It’s no longer a State but a deep alliance that rules the West & is trying to rule the entire world”

“It’s completely beneath human comprehension and is pure Satanism”
 
Post 925 seals the deal for me. Before that I was on board with the crowd that said if the dems had anything like that on Trump they would have used it. However, not if he also had all of their names, which he probably does from his 1st term as President.

Things are now coming into focus. By that I mean, over the last year or so there are things that just don't add up. I'm doing this off the top of my head so I may miss an item or 3 but here goes.

We have a big deal being made by Bondi et al about the Epstein Files.
Bondi has the influencers in and gives them the fake binders. She claims to have all the files now and orders FBI to go through them and redact everything to protect the victims. She's making a big deal out of this and demanding all of the files from FBI and gives them a deadline to get them all to her.

Then all of a sudden her and Kash and Bongino are all like, yea there's nothing credible there. At this point everyone is like WTF? I dont think anyone is buying that BS and I think everyone knows releasing those files will bring down the entire , well, I dont even know what, government, deep state, all of the major players in all aspects of the deep state.

Then Trump is acting oddly suspicious about it all as well. When asked about it he says, are we still talking about this? Like the biggest story in probably 20 years and he thinks this just went away? He's isn't that stupid. None of this is making any sense.

Now let's fast forward to Iran. No warning given and no reason given. (No evidence either and also no evidence in last years bombings) A complete 180 from everything he campaigned on and now a few people are leavings administration. Bongino (Who still supports him but seems to be seriously compromised) Kent and a whole lot of supporters that have left the farm so to speak. This is happening mostly because of Iran and his about face from his campaign promises.

To all of us Iran makes no sense. Same old BS reasons they used for Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction ect. And of course BIBI with his warnings that Iran is weeks away from getting a nuke, same thing he has said for 25 years but for some odd reason, Trump goes along with him this time. Against his intelligence according to Tulsi Gabbard but he goes anyway and starts a war. The propaganda machine is in overdrive trying to convince everyone but the MAGA base is in serious turmoil. It's being fractured. Some are hard core supporters and probably dont have time to look at all the evidence so they take his word for it all. Others have looked at all the evidence and are seriously scratching their heads wondering WTF is really going on.

Then you take post 925 above and it all starts to make sense. All of the defection by his administration and of course the ultimate distraction from the Epstein Files and Trump getting caught, is WW3
 
Cigar, now expand that thought process to encompass ANYONE in a position of power, influence or coercion (real or imagined)...

Then expand yet again to take in those that have been nameless and lived in darkness for eternity that have wielded the top of the pyramid level of power and you'll be close.
 
Cigarlover said:
Post 925 seals the deal for me. Before that I was on board with the crowd that said if the dems had anything like that on Trump they would have used it. However, not if he also had all of their names, which he probably does from his 1st term as President.

Things are now coming into focus. By that I mean, over the last year or so there are things that just don't add up. I'm doing this off the top of my head so I may miss an item or 3 but here goes.

We have a big deal being made by Bondi et al about the Epstein Files.
Bondi has the influencers in and gives them the fake binders. She claims to have all the files now and orders FBI to go through them and redact everything to protect the victims. She's making a big deal out of this and demanding all of the files from FBI and gives them a deadline to get them all to her.

Then all of a sudden her and Kash and Bongino are all like, yea there's nothing credible there. At this point everyone is like WTF? I dont think anyone is buying that BS and I think everyone knows releasing those files will bring down the entire , well, I dont even know what, government, deep state, all of the major players in all aspects of the deep state.

Then Trump is acting oddly suspicious about it all as well. When asked about it he says, are we still talking about this? Like the biggest story in probably 20 years and he thinks this just went away? He's isn't that stupid. None of this is making any sense.

Now let's fast forward to Iran. No warning given and no reason given. (No evidence either and also no evidence in last years bombings) A complete 180 from everything he campaigned on and now a few people are leavings administration. Bongino (Who still supports him but seems to be seriously compromised) Kent and a whole lot of supporters that have left the farm so to speak. This is happening mostly because of Iran and his about face from his campaign promises.

To all of us Iran makes no sense. Same old BS reasons they used for Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction ect. And of course BIBI with his warnings that Iran is weeks away from getting a nuke, same thing he has said for 25 years but for some odd reason, Trump goes along with him this time. Against his intelligence according to Tulsi Gabbard but he goes anyway and starts a war. The propaganda machine is in overdrive trying to convince everyone but the MAGA base is in serious turmoil. It's being fractured. Some are hard core supporters and probably dont have time to look at all the evidence so they take his word for it all. Others have looked at all the evidence and are seriously scratching their heads wondering WTF is really going on.

Then you take post 925 above and it all starts to make sense. All of the defection by his administration and of course the ultimate distraction from the Epstein Files and Trump getting caught, is WW3
Click to expand...
I don't totally buy it; and I look at the source of your referenced post...Forbes, Goldman-Sachs, the powers behind the Status Quo. Those who've felt as threatened as the Dumbo Left.

Now, I grant, I know little factual; but the barrage of accusations, coupled to suddenly-appearing documents, has me suspicious. If everyone's a liar, than, what is Truth?

THAT SAID...this is a problem Trump made for himself. He could have released what Justice had. He could have sacked Blondie. If he COULDN'T, because Mossad...then, come clean. And resign.

His actions open himself up for suspicion, I agree. And to try to cover it, is to be complicit. At this point I have no sympathy.

We, the Flyover Class, got used once again.
 

Epstein Accountant Richard Kahn Asked Point Blank 'What Were the Sources of His Wealth' | APT​

Mar 26, 2026 #epstein #usnews #apt
In a deposition tied to the Jeffrey Epstein probe, his longtime accountant Richard Kahn was asked a direct question: what were the sources of Epstein's wealth.
Kahn's testimony outlines a structured financial model built on client fees, investment income, and real estate holdings. According to the deposition, Epstein generated revenue through financial, tax, and estate planning services, alongside returns from investments including interest and dividends. Real estate also played a key role, contributing to a stream of passive income.
The testimony offers a rare inside look at how Jeffrey Epstein managed and expanded his wealth over time - a central question in ongoing investigations into his financial network and associations.


15:33
 
searcher said:

Epstein Accountant Richard Kahn Asked Point Blank 'What Were the Sources of His Wealth' | APT​

Mar 26, 2026 #epstein #usnews #apt
In a deposition tied to the Jeffrey Epstein probe, his longtime accountant Richard Kahn was asked a direct question: what were the sources of Epstein's wealth.
Kahn's testimony outlines a structured financial model built on client fees, investment income, and real estate holdings. According to the deposition, Epstein generated revenue through financial, tax, and estate planning services, alongside returns from investments including interest and dividends. Real estate also played a key role, contributing to a stream of passive income.
The testimony offers a rare inside look at how Jeffrey Epstein managed and expanded his wealth over time - a central question in ongoing investigations into his financial network and associations.


15:33
Click to expand...


As if that moneychanger rat would spill the beans on the cabal and its gatekeeper...
 

Bank of America agrees to pay $72.5 million to settle Epstein lawsuit​

Bank of America agreed to pay $72.5 million to settle a lawsuit that alleged the bank kept ties to people close to Jeffrey Epstein and failed to flag suspicious payments between the convicted sex offender and his associates and victims.

The proposed class-action lawsuit was filed last year on behalf of a woman who said she was sexually abused and trafficked by Epstein between 2011 and 2019, as well as on behalf of other victims.

The lawsuit alleged that Bank of America “financially benefited” from Epstein’s circle and failed to file suspicious activity reports with the government, despite the information it gleaned from the accounts it provided to those around him. Unlike other lawsuits against banks that resulted in settlements, this suit wasn’t primarily about Epstein having his own accounts at Bank of America.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...-epstein-lawsuit/ar-AA1ZzLaU?ocid=socialshare
 
Who gets all that dough??



Bank of America just agreed to pay $72.5 million for helping Jeffrey Epstein traffic underage girls.

The settlement dropped late Friday night. Buried under war headlines and protest coverage. Almost like they planned it that way.

And this is literally the FOURTH major bank settlement tied to Epstein's sex trafficking operation.

JPMorgan paid $290 million to victims. Then another $75 million to the US Virgin Islands. Deutsche Bank paid $75 million to victims and got hit with a $150 million regulatory fine on top of that. Now Bank of America adds $72.5 million.

Total exposed so far: Over $660 million.

Number of bankers criminally charged: ZERO.

Number of bankers who went to prison: ZERO.

Every single settlement came with "no admission of wrongdoing." Every bank said some version of "we regret the association" and moved on.

But the court filings tell a very different story:

JPMorgan filed suspicious activity reports on Epstein's accounts as early as 2002. Their own compliance team flagged him. They KNEW something was wrong but they kept banking him for 11 more years anyway.

When Epstein was alive and actively trafficking girls, JPMorgan flagged $4.3 million in suspicious transactions.

After he died in his cell? They retroactively reported $1.3 BILLION in suspicious activity going back to 2003. That's 300 times more than what they reported while he was alive.

A Senate investigation found that JPMorgan executives overruled their own compliance officers to keep Epstein as a client. Internal emails show top executives approved continued business with Epstein even AFTER his 2008 conviction because he was bringing in ultra-wealthy referrals.

Deutsche Bank picked Epstein up as a client in 2013, the same year JPMorgan finally dropped him. Their own CEO later admitted onboarding him was "a critical mistake that should never have happened." They literally kept him for five more years.

Bank of America allegedly didn't file suspicious activity reports on Epstein-linked accounts until AFTER he was dead.

The pattern is identical every time:

See the red flags. Ignore them. Profit from the relationship. Wait until the client dies or gets arrested. Then file a report. Then write a settlement check. Then say you did nothing wrong.

Now think about this...

These are the same banks that freeze your business account over a $5,000 wire transfer. The same compliance departments that require endless forms of ID to open a checking account. The same institutions that flag small business owners for "suspicious activity" if they deposit cash from their own customers two weeks in a row.

But a convicted sex offender runs hundreds of millions through their systems for DECADES and nobody notices. Nobody reports it. Nobody escalates it. Nobody calls law enforcement.

Until he's dead. Then suddenly everyone remembers everything.

Senator Wyden called for a criminal investigation. The Treasury Department has thousands of pages of Epstein bank records they still won't release. Congressional investigators say the full picture of what these banks knew hasn't come close to being revealed.

$660 million in settlements and fines. But not a single criminal charge against any banker at any institution.

That's the system working exactly as designed.

I wonder why no one's talking about the files anymore?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom