Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Oh hey look squirrel. What are they trying to hide today?
Oh they downgraded the credit of the USSA.
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
- Trump will be formally charged tomorrow.
- Judge is a no-nonsense mammy jammer who will not take any shit.
- Six unnamed coconspirators will be charged later on. Jack Smith wants to rock and roll with this and get the trial over before the next election.
- Hopefully the trial will be televised.
FLASH
Dan Bongino
@dbongino
People who’ve had their political opponents arrested:
Mao
Stalin
Mussolini
Pol Pot
Castro
Hitler
Amin
Xi
Biden
FACT
6:06 PM · Aug 1, 2023
·
749.1K
Views
This. They believe they can lock him up.2. If they are certain they can lock him up, why wait until it just looks like political persecution? Why didn't they move years ago?
Which is why they picked the "judge" they did. To get as much of his evidence as possible ruled as inadmissible in court, so that if he and his lawyers try bringing it up in open court, they could be charged with contempt of court."How do you introduce EVIDENCE legally?" Q
A little bit about the judge..............
From the link:
“Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President,” Chutkan wrote in her 2-year-old ruling, a rebuke that is sure to echo as she prepares to preside over the newest criminal case against the current GOP frontrunner for the presidential nomination in 2024.
Trump’s new judge is a tough Jan. 6 sentencer — and has a history with him
Meet Tanya Chutkan, the Obama appointee who was randomly chosen to preside over Trump's newest case.www.politico.com
I don't think anyone here is dumb enough to think this judge was "randomly" selected.
To do that requires that one stand for nation over party.Face it, your system is broken and as it stands will probably never deliver a result that will look credible to the majority of voters. This is what should concern people like you
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?