One for
@Casey Jones
This loco wants to be a rail grinder. Lol
A blast from the past!
I'd almost bet I'd run that unit...it's a former Conrail GP-38, looks like. Conrail was an early adopter of "anti-climb" pilots...castings above the couplers, incorporated into the frame, that would catch a coupler from another engine or a railcar from working up above the loco's coupler and then shoving into the carbody. Now it's standard, probably required; but in the 1980s, only Conrail ordered power. Former SBD or Chessie EMDs of that era, just had the walkway end abruptly, with a narrow drop-down foot walkway extender out of sheet metal that was to meet one from another unit, when coupled together. The anti-climb pilots almost met, when one engine was tied to another.
Second...traction control was a new thing on those units. I had one one night, we were working an industry turn...I had an SD-40 as lead power, with a GP-15 as a trailer. The GP-15 was adapted from the MP-15 yard model...the GP was intended to replace the 1950s-vintage GP-7 or GP-9. They didn't get many customers - railroads decided to order MP-15s for yard and transfer work. But Conrail had a few, because they had a lot of secondary lines that would later be ripped out. Light axle-loading ratings.
But there was an obscure (and unmarked) circuit on its panel that kept tripping all night, and taking the main power with it. Finally I figured out that the main breaker would stay on if I left that one circuit off...that, until we were yanking a heavy drag of cars out of an industry, and my man on the ground was yelling at me to stop. Turns out that the 15 was spinning its axles like grinding wheels.
CSX's contribution to this, once they took control of our part of Conrail...was, they didn't believe in giving the crews enough. Of anything. Not enough time to get a job done; not enough pay to motivate the crews (there were ways to chisel pay, since we were paid by the job, not the hour) and not enough power. EVER. Not on the road, not on industry or yard works. Our joke was, the multi-levels (auto racks) were 60-mph trains with 30-mph power. That was if you ran at Notch 8 the whole way. The koledge kidz in Jacksonville, who would have to authorize usage of power ON EACH TRAIN (the Power Desk, they called it) said, the rulebook said it was enough.
Yeah, when new. These were 25-years-old and moar; and often maintained to Seaboard or ACL standards (two slipshod predecessors of CSX). So, trains that could get Cleveland to Buffalo in five hours, now took over twelve.
And of course 12 hours was our on-duty limit, by FRA standards. And we were paid no overtime.
So...often in yard moves, one GP-38 or SD-40, pulling cars like that, would wind up lighting off the rails as traction would break free. Looks snowy out there; that can promote wheel slippage.
The fire out the stack, comes from hundreds of hours of idling, where oily soot cakes onto the stack, followed by a protracted burst of really-hot exhaust, as in pulling very hard for maybe 30 minutes. It's not dangerous - not to the engine. Engine fires come from fuel leaks or electrical shorts. What those stack fires can do, is start wildfires in dry areas. Sparks and even oily clumps blow out, on fire, and start tinder burning.
EDIT: I got curious. So, I looked up the number - yeah, you can do such things, foamers (rail freaks) have a big presence online - and I was half-right. It is a former Conrail unit - CSXT 4436 was renumbered from CR 3363.
But it's not a GP-38. It's a GP-40-2, a locomotive that wasn't common in Cleveland or Buffalo. I only ran a few of them, time to time.
Online photos, as CSX 4436, were taken at Wallbridge, Ohio, outside Toledo. The Dash-2 models had modular electronics, a big step forward for their time. I couldn't find a build date, but probably it was about 1979-84. Conrail was on a buying spree, being newly profitable, and no one knew the future would be with six-axle (SD-series, for EMD) locomotives, not the four-axle (GP or F series) that brought in the diesel revolution in the 1950s.
Portrait photo of it, in better condition, with new-ish "Dark Future" (third pain scheme for CSX corporate) paint, here:
Apparently the unit was having a turbocharger failure when that video was snapped. Probably the engineer was trying to keep things moving, and gave it too much throttle.