World Bank Announces "Gold Handbook"

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

searcher

morning
Moderator
Benefactor
Messages
12,153
Reaction score
2,616
Points
238

REALITY Matters - World Bank Announces "Gold Handbook" | Lobo Tiggre​

Premiered 12 hours ago

The World Bank has come out with a handbook for investing in gold. And former U.S. Secretary of The Treasury Larry Summers admitted inflation was 18% in 2022 using the 1980’s formula of calculating inflation. “Reality matters,” says Lobo Tiggre, The Independent Speculator. He discusses how the mainstream is waking up to the importance of gold and the risks of U.S. dollar devaluation.

37:04

INTERVIEW TIMELINE:
0:00 Intro
2:10 Economic update
12:55 Gold vs miners
26:00 Reality matters
34:51 Independent Speculator
 
Lulz. Does that link in post #2 work for you peeps? I get a 403 Forbidden error when I try to open it. I guess the World Bank has blocked me for some reason.
 
The link is now working for me. Strange. Anyway, some analysis...


More:

 
So, now that gold as an investment is covered I want the World Bank to publish a second handbook about how making gold everyday's money.
 
I could write it for them:

1. Either remove legal tender monopoly for fiat (unlikely) or grant legal tender status to gold (also not likely, but slightly more likely than first scenario).
2. Build payment systems to faciliate payment of government debts (taxes, licenses, etc.) with gold.

That's it. The private market can handle the rest.
 
It reads, "if you don't hold it you don't own it."

Hi Nick,
your neighbor has bought 10 oz of gold and hold them in the Texas Bullion Depository.
Would you say he doesn't own them?
 
Hi Nick,
your neighbor has bought 10 oz of gold and hold them in the Texas Bullion Depository.
Would you say he doesn't own them?
He may not have access to it when it's most needed. He owns it, but may never get it back.
 
When that ownership is contingent on trust, it's not really ownership is it.

Hi Chief
if you lend your car to your friend, you are not really its owner anymore?

Another example
You go to vacation and give in custody 10oz of your gold to your friend Peter
As long as you bathe in the Bahamas you are not really owner of those 10 Krugerrands?


I agree that when you can't touch your things you are less x... you have less x... than when you can,
but I don't think that x is ownership.
 

Three things you don't lend out:

- gold
- car
- women

 
He may not have access to it when it's most needed. He owns it, but may never get it back.
Right, so the "If you don't hold it you don't own it", that's not true.
You own things even if you don't hold them, that was my point.

The other point is what you mentioned, the problem of accessibility.
Clearly accessibility depends on holding it.

I think the "If you don't hold it you don't own it" means "If you don't hold it you can't be sure that it's there", which is true.
 
It's tongue in cheek so it's easy to remember and gets the point across. If you want to be literal, then that is different. Same thing as driving 100mph on Daytona Speedway. If you drove 100mph on International Speedway Dr you would get a ticket, but if you were on the track you would probably lose the race.
 
A few real world examples:
  • MF Global - many folks thought they owned gold contracts; they found out they didn't own squat. Were they collateral damage from monetary regime hitmen?
  • PM IRAs fraud - bad faith or incompetence, the effect for the customer is the same
  • Silver vaulting fraud - suckered by the ponzi
  • Tulving - You paid your money, the metal belongs to you, right? Not if you are left holding the bag when the music stops
 
A lot of the benefits of gold are countered when another possesses yours.

A lot of the benefits of gold are countered when it gets stolen

Imagine living under certain circumstances (bad neighbourhood... bad house residents... unsecured housing... etc.).
Don't think only USA.
Now think about the option letting your gold be stored by an internationally renown company specialised in gold storage, conducting regular independent audits.

My point is, that tongue in cheek motto isn't always right, it depends on the circumstances.
It's unrealistic to treat it as a universal rule of conduct for gold investors worldwide.
 
Last edited:
A lot of the benefits of gold are countered when another possesses yours.
A lot of the benefits of gold are countered when it gets lost

We say the motto "If you don't hold it..." is particularly true in a SHTF scenario.
Think about the circumstances when a stacker has to quickly relocate. With a pick-up, ok, as long as it's not 200 pounds of silver.
Bus, train, ship... less easy, by plane... forget it.

A Palestinian stacker following the "If you don't hold it..." motto has probably lost everything right now. If he succeed to get out, with an internet connection he could use the value of his metals if they are stored by companies like Bullionvault, Bullionstar, Goldmoney etc
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…