The entire DOGE program was scuttled by the Dems.
Why the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Closed
The
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — a high-profile cost-cutting initiative launched by President Donald Trump in January 2025 — officially shut down on
July 4, 2026, eight months ahead of its scheduled end date
Times Now. The closure came after
Elon Musk, who had been appointed as a “special government employee” to lead the agency, left Washington in May 2025
TIME+1.
Key Reasons for the Shutdown
1. Musk’s departure and lack of progress
Musk’s 130‑day contract expired in May 2025, and he had not come close to achieving his publicly stated $1 trillion deficit reduction target
TIME. Tensions between Musk and Trump over his “One Big Beautiful Bill” and other policy disagreements reportedly worsened, leading to a breakdown in their working relationship
TIME.
2. Political and political‑style controversies
DOGE’s aggressive measures — including mass layoffs, contract cancellations, and agency closures — drew criticism from Democrats and some Republicans for overreach, lack of oversight, and potential legal or ethical concerns
Yahoo Finance. Critics questioned whether the promised $2 trillion in savings was realistic, with the administration later claiming only about $215 billion in savings
Times Now.
3. Internal dysfunction and public backlash
Staff reportedly packed up and left before the end date, and tensions rose between Trump and Musk in June 2025
Yahoo Finance. The initiative’s rapid, top‑down approach and minimal stakeholder input fueled skepticism about transparency and accountability
Yahoo Finance.
4. Absorption into other agencies
After the shutdown, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) confirmed DOGE no longer existed as a centralized entity, with most of its functions absorbed into OPM and the Office of Management and Budget
TIME. The White House said it would continue pursuing DOGE’s goals, but without issuing a final performance report
Times Now.
Legacy
DOGE’s closure left its legacy sharply contested: supporters credited it with some efficiency gains and deregulation, while opponents saw it as politically driven, poorly executed, and lacking verifiable results
Times Now. The initiative’s abrupt end underscored the fragility of politically charged, high‑profile government projects.
So were the tariffs. Courts made him refund it, remember?
The tariffs are still on going, as you're well aware of as per your posts in the
Tracking Trump's Tariffs and Turbulent Trade Talks thread. lol
As for the refunds you're right but the refunds went to big business not the little guy.