Elections

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!



This gentleman wrote the most precisely accurate and well-reasoned legal argument regarding Trump's recent EO on voting that I have seen ANYWHERE, and here is what Wikipedia has to say about him:

"David Clements is a former American lawyer and a former assistant professor at New Mexico State University. He is known for his advocacy of election conspiracy theories in the United States."

Read that twice.

"Advocacy of election conspiracy theories."

Bastards.

If a website can get haunted by a ghost, Josef Goebbels is living in the Wikipedia HTML code somewhere.
 

Court tosses sentence for former clerk in scheme tied to 2020 election​

A Colorado appeals court Thursday threw out the nine-year prison sentence for Tina Peters, a former Mesa County clerk convicted on charges related to a scheme to bolster President Donald Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen.

The court upheld Peters’s conviction but concluded that the judge improperly sentenced her based in part on her repeated false claims about elections. That wasn’t permissible under her First Amendment right to free speech, the court found, and she must be resentenced based on her conduct alone.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...to-2020-election/ar-AA201vCr?ocid=socialshare
 

The DOJ Misled a Judge About How It’s Using Voter Roll Data​

Last week in Rhode Island, in a hearing over the Trump administration’s efforts to access the state’s unredacted voter lists, US district judge Mary McElroy asked a Department of Justice lawyer what the agency had been doing with the voter roll data it already amassed from other states in recent months.

“We have not done anything yet,” said Eric Neff, the acting chief of the agency’s voting section, a core part of the DOJ’s civil rights division that focuses on enforcing federal laws that protect the right to vote. Neff added that the data the DOJ collected from states—which can include Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, dates of birth, and addresses—was being kept separate.

More:

 
That wasn’t permissible under her First Amendment right to free speech, the court found, and she must be resentenced based on her conduct alone.
time served would still be an injustice! She caught them in the act!
 
Back
Top Bottom