Elections

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!



This gentleman wrote the most precisely accurate and well-reasoned legal argument regarding Trump's recent EO on voting that I have seen ANYWHERE, and here is what Wikipedia has to say about him:

"David Clements is a former American lawyer and a former assistant professor at New Mexico State University. He is known for his advocacy of election conspiracy theories in the United States."

Read that twice.

"Advocacy of election conspiracy theories."

Bastards.

If a website can get haunted by a ghost, Josef Goebbels is living in the Wikipedia HTML code somewhere.
 

Court tosses sentence for former clerk in scheme tied to 2020 election​

A Colorado appeals court Thursday threw out the nine-year prison sentence for Tina Peters, a former Mesa County clerk convicted on charges related to a scheme to bolster President Donald Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen.

The court upheld Peters’s conviction but concluded that the judge improperly sentenced her based in part on her repeated false claims about elections. That wasn’t permissible under her First Amendment right to free speech, the court found, and she must be resentenced based on her conduct alone.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...to-2020-election/ar-AA201vCr?ocid=socialshare
 

The DOJ Misled a Judge About How It’s Using Voter Roll Data​

Last week in Rhode Island, in a hearing over the Trump administration’s efforts to access the state’s unredacted voter lists, US district judge Mary McElroy asked a Department of Justice lawyer what the agency had been doing with the voter roll data it already amassed from other states in recent months.

“We have not done anything yet,” said Eric Neff, the acting chief of the agency’s voting section, a core part of the DOJ’s civil rights division that focuses on enforcing federal laws that protect the right to vote. Neff added that the data the DOJ collected from states—which can include Social Security numbers, drivers licenses, dates of birth, and addresses—was being kept separate.

More:

 
That wasn’t permissible under her First Amendment right to free speech, the court found, and she must be resentenced based on her conduct alone.
time served would still be an injustice! She caught them in the act!
 
a good read... she woke up!

McKinley: The President They Buried Twice​

Once by a bullet.

Once by history.

Trump keeps saying his name. Here is exactly what he is pointing at
Vivify Mariposa
Apr 05, 2026

I registered Democrat the day I was eligible to vote. The machine prepared me for it. I did not question it. That is how the machine works. It does not ask. It environments.

I worked at a law firm that launched Hillary Clinton’s career. I followed her work. I admired what I saw. A woman who survived her husband’s infidelity and refused to let it define her because she had something larger she was building toward. I supported that. I believed in it.

Then 2016 came. And the veil fell with it.

Not because Trump convinced me of anything. I was not his supporter. I did not vote for him. The veil fell because of what I watched happen after he won. The reaction told me the size of what was threatened. When every institution moves simultaneously against one man, that is not politics. That is a system protecting itself.

2017 proved me wrong about him. Slowly. I stopped following mainstream media the way I had. Then I noticed how they used comedians to do the work the anchors could not do directly. You cannot argue with a joke. The laugh lands before the logic can catch up. That is not entertainment. That is messaging with a laugh track.

November 2019. SARS-CoV-2 was already being covered in some circles. I asked a simple question. We had SARS in 2003. We closed borders then. Why not now. The answer I got was that I was crazy. A conspiracy theorist. Paranoid.

Then COVID-19 arrived and the response confirmed the question. This was not about a virus. You do not destroy an economy over a virus you already had a template for managing. This was about something else. And the something else had a target. And the target was the man who had already proven the institutions wrong once.

I worked an election in New York City. I saw numbers. I saw how many people in New York City were voting for Trump. Then I saw the result. I kept what I saw to myself. I understood the room I was working in. New York is the most Democratic controlled state in the country. You do not say certain things in certain rooms.

Then social media blocked me.

And that was the confirmation I did not need because I already knew. You do not silence what is wrong. You silence what is dangerous. They made it clear. I had something they wanted quiet.

That is how I learned to read patterns. Not from a book. From living inside the machine long enough to see how it operates. From watching what they do when someone asks the wrong question. From noticing who gets silenced and when.

McKinley asked the wrong question for his era. His question was: what if the government funded itself through trade and did not need to borrow from private bankers. What if wages rose without a Federal Reserve. What if working people thrived without an income tax.

They buried that question under a hundred years of Smoot-Hawley and academic rankings and Roosevelt mythology.

The method is always the same. Silence the question. Discredit the person asking it. Replace the evidence with a narrative that serves the institution.

I know that method. I lived inside it.

Now watch how it was done to McKinley.

more:
 
Back
Top Bottom