Privacy, encryption vs. Surveillance state

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

Bottom Feeder said:
Heh — ready for the Weimar waterfall to begin.
Click to expand...
I keep waiting for it.

It keeps not happening.

And everything keeps getting loonier. The food...the mRNA...PA Governor Shapiro is cracking down on the Amish, who've dodged the Autism Epidemic...he HATES the idea that his sponsor, Big Pharma, has their lies exposed with a cohort that ignores orders for 80 injections for children.

Meantime, the demented bitch-kooks in Brussels keep on taunting Russia. And I'm listening to a podcast with soundbytes from Scotland Yard's head of Homicide...a DEI wombyn, don't you know...who had to jump in with female hysteria, about how absurd the claim is that Lindsey was let off because she's a Protected Class. WHILE babbling on about how sensitive the Sisterhood has to be to various chemical imbalances.

This is head of a major police homicide unit!

The Overton Window only slides left. And it keeps on sliding. Now they turn BUYING CRAP into a shell-game, spin-the-numbers gamble, with the House having a brake on the wheel...? WE NEED A COLLAPSE.
 
Casey Jones said:
I keep waiting for it.

It keeps not happening.
Click to expand...
It's been supposed to be "happening" any day now for the past 50 years, if ya listen to the doomers in this community.
.....and I see what they've been getting at. Our fiscal and monetary situation has sucked for the past 100+ years.

Only thing saving it is the fact that we have been and still are "King of the hill", so to speak.
......and despite our debt load, still the cleanest shirt in the laundry hamper of World currencies.


What'll f' us up is when we can no longer sell enough Bonds at a low enough (affordable) interest rate in order to pay off old debt.

When that happens, it'll be "tits up" time. When that happens, no one will have enough ammo for what's gonna happen.

Which (believe it or not) is a big part of why Trump is doing a lot of the stuff he is doing.

The way's of all those fighting him, (the Globalists) is to manage the decline and help China to take our spot.
 

Court proceedings begin for 5 IMPD officers charged in Flock camera scandal​


INDIANAPOLIS — Court proceedings are in motion for the five IMPD officers charged in the department's Flock camera scandal.

The range of allegations include unauthorized searches of vehicles belonging to intimate partners, exes, and strangers using Flock Safety's Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology.

Officer Michael Rogers is due in court on Monday, Sept. 28, while Officers Matthew Binford, Abigail Cramer, and Cassandra Crawley are set for court appearances on Tuesday.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...k-camera-scandal/ar-AA2d4ZpX?ocid=socialshare
 

Federal Jury Strikes Down Texas Sheriff’s Surveillance-Driven Traffic Stop Program​


License-plate-reading cameras flagged an ordinary road trip as suspicious. A Bexar County deputy invented a traffic violation, interrogated the driver, and searched his truck. A jury said that was unconstitutional.

Today, a jury in federal court found Bexar County liable for running an unconstitutional traffic stop scheme that turned mass surveillance of American drivers into a pipeline of pretextual traffic stops and unconstitutional searches.

The unconstitutional program ran in five steps: First, surveillance cameras across the state and country recorded license plates and logged when and where cars went. Second, analysts and anonymous tipsters flagged ordinary travel, like driving toward the border and back, as suspicious. Third, Bexar County sheriff’s deputies invented a traffic violation to justify pulling over the flagged driver. Fourth, deputies pulled drivers into their front seats, interrogated them and asked consent to search their car. Finally, fifth, if the driver refused to consent to a search, a K-9 alert from a manipulated dog supplied the probable cause to search anyway. This practice happened for four years to countless motorists.

“This is a huge win, and not just for Alek,” said Institute for Justice (IJ) Attorney Christie Hebert. “Motorists across this country are being watched by local, state and federal agents, flagged by AI-powered cameras, and then pulled over for a bogus offense that exists only as a cover story for an interrogation and a search. The Fourth Amendment does not permit this. Today a jury of Texans looked at how this program actually worked and said so. Every agency in this state should understand that we are fully prepared to enforce this verdict.”

The jury found the practice violated the Fourth Amendment rights of Alek Schott, a Houston father of two who was stopped on Interstate 35 in March 2022 on his way home from a business trip. Schott was held on the shoulder for 76 minutes, interrogated in the front seat of a patrol car, and subjected to a search of his truck after a drug dog alerted. Deputies found nothing, because there was nothing to find.

Alek sells equipment for his family’s oilfield business. On March 15, 2022, he drove from his home near Houston to a well pad outside Carrizo Springs with a colleague, staying the night at a hotel nearby so he could start early and not drive tired. He was stopped by Bexar County Deputy Joel Babb on the way home — not for anything he did on the road, but because a network of cameras operated by the federal government flagged his Ford F-250 as suspicious.

The tip reached Bexar County through a group chat on WhatsApp, a private messaging app, called the “Northwest Highway Group.” Deputy Babb testified the information came from a man he knew only as “Kiki,” who Babb believed worked at a federal fusion center in Laredo. To make the stop, Deputy Babb parked on the shoulder, waited for the truck, followed it, and eventually stopped it. Babb said the reason for the stop was that Alek had drifted across the fog line on the road. Evidence shown at the trial showed Schott never veered outside the lines.

“After the stop, I filed a complaint with the Sheriff’s Office because I knew what happened to me was wrong,” said Alek Schott. “The department reviewed it, told me they didn’t see any violation, and said if I had a problem with it, I should sue them. So I did. Today is vindication, not just for me, but for every driver they ran through this.”

Alek sued under the federal civil rights law that holds local governments accountable when an official policy or custom causes a constitutional violation. That required proving more than one bad stop: that the Sheriff’s Office had a policy or custom of stopping and searching drivers this way, that the Sheriff knew or should have known, and that the practice caused what happened to Alek. The jury agreed, and awarded him $76—one dollar for every minute he spent detained on I-35. He never asked for a penny more. IJ has represented him free of charge since 2023.

“This is what mass surveillance looks like when it reaches the shoulder of the highway,” said IJ Attorney Senior Josh Windham. “An AI-powered camera flagged Alek’s plate. An anonymous law enforcement agent decided his completely ordinary trip looked suspicious. And a deputy went out and found a violation that never happened. This unit ran thousands of drivers through that routine—humiliating, invasive interrogations and searches of people who had done nothing wrong. It all rests on the idea that if you watch enough innocent people closely enough, criminals will fall out. That’s wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and now, a jury has said so.”

The jury awarded Alek $76, exactly what he asked for; one dollar for every minute he was detained. Money was never what mattered. This was and has always been about the Constitution. IJ will now ask the court to enjoin Bexar County from using baseless traffic stops as a tool for warrantless searches, and will work to enforce the precedent across the state.

“For more than three decades, IJ has gone to court to hold government to the promise of the Constitution,” said IJ Senior Attorney Jeff Rowes. “Today’s verdict is a victory for ordinary Americans who want to travel our roads and highways without being stopped for bogus traffic stops, held for baseless interrogations in police cars, and then searched after a manipulated drug dog alert. Driving the highways doesn’t make one suspicious and IJ will be there to enforce constitutional restrictions on police authority.”

ij.org

Federal Jury Strikes Down Texas Sheriff’s Surveillance-Driven Traffic Stop Program - Institute for Justice

SAN ANTONIO—Today, a jury in federal court found Bexar County liable for running an unconstitutional traffic stop scheme that turned mass surveillance of American drivers […]
ij.org ij.org
 

Flock Cameras Lead Police To Identify Wrong Car In Road Rage Case, Armed Officers Surround Wrong House At 4 A.M.​

Imagine police surrounding your house and knocking on your door early in the morning, suspecting you of a crime you didn't commit. That's what happened to Will Penn, Robin Pen, and Penn's 94-year-old grandmother, reports Lexington, Kentucky's Lex News. As is so often the case these days, this was a case of mistaken identity, spurred by a Flock camera.

The couple's Ring camera captured the sequence of events. At 3:56 a.m., several Lexington police cars began to surround their property. At 4:08, they shone their spotlights on the house, and armed police knocked on the door. Penn and Pen went outside to speak with them, which was when they learned what this was all about.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...g-house-at-4-a-m/ar-AA2drqo6?ocid=socialshare

Source:

www.jalopnik.com

Flock Cameras Lead Police To Identify Wrong Car In Road Rage Case, Armed Officers Surround Wrong House At 4 A.M. - Jalopnik

A driver told Lexington, Kentucky police that a dark-colored Ram 2500 had been involved in a road-rage incident, so police turned to Flock to find it.
www.jalopnik.com www.jalopnik.com
 
searcher said:
Flock Cameras Lead Police To Identify Wrong Car In Road Rage Case, Armed Officers Surround Wrong House At 4 A.M.
Click to expand...

If Flock's system misidentify's someone and it leads to stuff like that, Flock should have to pay them $10 million.

If so, Flock would fix their system overnight.
 
...
But if we had to guess, it would seem Flock itself put them up.

No one else could benefit, as the data these cameras collect only feed into the Flock network.

So we know with near-absolute certainty they put up the extra cameras; the next question is why.

If they only make money selling their subscription service, putting up free cameras makes no sense.

The only logical conclusion?

They make money selling the data.

So much money that it's worth putting up the cameras for free.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom