Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
San Diegans Push Back on Flock ALPR Surveillance
Approaching San Diego’s first annual review of the city's controversial Flock Safety contract, a local coalition is calling on the city council to roll back this dangerous and costly automated license plate reader (ALPR) program.The TRUST Coalition—a grassroots alliance including Electronic...www.eff.org
Related.
The Shady World of Surveillance Pricing (Ft. Lina Khan)
Jun 10, 2025
Should corporations be able to weaponize your personal data to rip you off?
Well, they may already be doing that thanks to a shady tactic called “surveillance pricing.”
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan explains what we can do about it.
5:10
Bodily autonomy—the right to privacy and integrity over our own bodies—is rapidly vanishing.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard said:Over the past few months, I’ve been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected.
As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a "back door" that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.
...
Yet, it seems FinCEN is determined to defy the spirit of the court’s orders. It has since decided to reintroduce the requirement—albeit at $1,000 instead of $200. The only mention of the active cases came in the form of two footnotes saying that the parties in those cases are exempt from the new order until the injunctions are lifted.
Making matters worse, the order now applies to a vastly greater area. The original order covered as many as one million people living in the thirty affected zip codes in California and Texas. However, FinCEN has now expanded the order to cover 3.2 million people living across 126 zip codes in Arizona, California, and Texas. Part of this expansion occurred because FinCEN decided to target entire counties instead of individual zip codes. The motivation for this expansion, however, is unknown.
Yet, as if that was not enough, the requirement also went into immediate effect. It was published in the Federal Register and became effective on the same day. The only flexibility that was given was a 30-day transition period for the newly affected areas.
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?