Algorithmic debanking

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

The article says Congress got thousands of complaints per major bank. That's a much bigger issue than we might have guessed from anecdotes here and there.
 

White House Preps Order to Punish Banks That Discriminate Against Conservatives​

The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order that threatens to fine lenders that drop customers for political reasons.

A draft of the executive order, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...st-conservatives/ar-AA1JUey5?ocid=socialshare
 
^^ That sounds nice, but I would rather they just remove the subjective criteria that allows banks and their regulators the opportunity to debank actors at will.
 
...
To truly fix debanking, Congress has to propose structural changes to America's anti–money laundering (AML) framework. These regulations can be weaponized given their lack of objectivity, transparency, and due process. Congress should also reform the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), which allows the collection and sharing (even to foreign competitors) of virtually all the financial and private information of Americans without their knowledge or consent.
...


Now we're talking.
 
...
Today, I'd like to address the Federal Reserve's approach to thinking about technology and tools like blockchain in context of bank supervision, including recent developments, the cost of supervisory focus on "reputational risk," and principles for a tailored regulatory framework that accommodates technology.

Reframing the Regulatory Mindset
Bank regulators work to promote safety and soundness in the financial system through regulation and supervisory practices. Our goal is not just a safe and sound banking system, but one that also serves its intended purpose of supporting consumers, businesses, and communities, and fostering economic growth. To accomplish this goal, regulators strive to strike a balance between managing risks that threaten safety and soundness, while also creating an environment that allows new technologies to take root and grow.

Innovation outside the banking system often complements the development and use of technology within the banking system, and often far outpaces that growth. As you're all aware, many groundbreaking tech innovations have been pioneered by developers outside of the traditional banking system.
...
In late June, the Board announced that reputational risk would no longer be considered in our supervisory process.4 To implement this lasting change, we are updating guidance, examination manuals, handbooks, and other supervisory materials to ensure the durability of this approach, which is a critical step in addressing the problem of de-banking. I am also considering whether we need a regulatory change to provide greater transparency and certainty about this approach. It is not the role of examiners or policymakers to direct which customers or industries to serve or which products to offer. That decision lies solely within the purview of bank management, limited by the safety and soundness of the institution,, the legal activities of its customer, and risks, if any, to financial stability.

Over time, "reputational risk" emerged as a priority area that policymakers emphasized for examinations. Exams or reviews focused on reputational risk have often lacked a sufficient nexus to financial risk and safety and soundness considerations that are the appropriate focus of our supervisory activities.

Let me be clear. We must adopt an approach that does not penalize or prohibit a bank from banking a customer engaged in legal activity. This approach must allow and encourage banks to provide banking products and services to any legal business, without disfavoring any particular viewpoints, businesses, or industries.
...

 
When's P Diddly gonna be unbanked?
How about, never.

Look, it's not about controlling crime, or even asserting control. They already have that, in this morphing soft-tyranny we're becoming.

It's about in-groups and out-groups. The in-groups are now "in" because they support the Bankster-Globalist Complex, are aligned with them - enabling money-printing or kiddy-diddling - or are involved with activities that help to normalize the Globalists' pet perversions.

IMHO, crypto is not going to save monetary freedom any more than the Internet promoted free information. The controllers of government and central-bank power are going to USE the characteristics of crypto, to further control us.

Now we can see an outline of their plan. Just as they farmed out censorship to the allegedly-private tech-bro companies, now CBDCs are going to be rebranded "stablecoins" and run by JBMChase and other connected banksters. For the mutual benefit of private banksters and government tyrants.
 
Republican and Democratic leaders agree: Closing the bank accounts of Americans for no apparent reason is wrong.
There's a lot of things that we used to agree, is "wrong." Sexually grooming kids is wrong. More wrong when it's done by the schools - Drag-Queen Story Hour, unisex locker rooms, etc.

Standards change with political expediencies. And today's Elites - BOTH sides, both Gavin Hairdo and Gomer Graham - know only political expediencies and nothing else. Moral scruples are long-ago overcome.

It's all about controlling, and looting, and, as we've seen, demociding, the Euro-American Middle Class.
 

JPMorgan discloses US probe over alleged conservative ‘debanking’ scandal​

The US government is investigating JPMorgan Chase over an alleged “debanking” scandal after President Trump claimed the nation’s biggest bank was rejecting customers with conservative political ties.

In a quarterly filing on Wednesday, JPMorgan Chase revealed it is “responding to requests from government authorities and other external parties regarding, among other things, the firm’s policies and processes and the provision of services to customers and potential customers.”

JPMorgan claimed the probe is a response to Trump’s executive order in August demanding regulators look into policies that might have led to “politicized or unlawful debanking.”

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...ebanking-scandal/ar-AA1PRqtS?ocid=socialshare
 
Opinion piece, take it fwiw and dyodd.

A Chinese-style social credit system is coming to America​

The ease with which personal banking is conducted in the modern West would surely cause some envy to our mattress-stuffing ancestors. Cashpoint machines abound, plastic is easy to carry, and, most comforting, one’s money is backed by the full faith and credit of the government. Importantly, unless one fundamentally transgresses the legal order, we can be sure our capital is always at a moment’s access.

Put another way, except in cases usually pertaining to national security, banks are rather indifferent to a client’s private life. The good, the bad, and the ugly are all welcome provided they have the right decimal count. And so, it pains me to report that in America, a peculiar phenomenon dubbed “de-banking” is beginning to occur with increasing visibility.

“De-banking” (or “de-risking”) is what it sounds like. A bank will, for legal, liability, or reputational risk, terminate – with notice – an individual account. Normally, this does not grab our attention. Criminal organizations and terrorists, we all agree, should be frozen out. And, of course, banks may choose with whom to conduct business.

More:


More on social credit systems.

 
Now I'm not what you'd call religious but here's a passage from the Bible that may kinda fit in with all this.


Who know what tf the future holds?
 
This is out of Germany. Now I don't give a rat's ass about the German Commies but picture yourself in a world where there is no cash, just a CBDC. Imagine what they could and would be capable of doing to you if you uttered or posted a word they didn't like.

 
This is out of Germany. Now I don't give a rat's ass about the German Commies but picture yourself in a world where there is no cash, just a CBDC. Imagine what they could and would be capable of doing to you if you uttered or posted a word they didn't like.

This is the blind side that the low-wattage Woketards always show.

They're ALL FOR government power - when it's used to torment "their" "enemies." Or those who speak hard, unemotional economic truths, regardless of the ox being gored.

But, eventually those same forces of government tyranny, are turned ON them. Even if they consider themselves inside the Party. Stalin conducted any number of purges...ending when he himself got "purged" (probably a stealth @$$@$$ination).

These half-wits don't think it can happen. In fact it cannot help BUT happen, given enough time.

The American structure was supposed to prevent this. But now at least half the country wants to dismantle the American structure.
 

Trump threatens to sue JPMorgan Chase for ‘debanking’ him​

  • President Donald Trump, in a post on Truth Social, threatened to sue JPMorgan Chase over allegedly “debanking” him following the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.
  • Trump and his family have a history of railing against financial institutions for allegedly refusing to work with them based on their politics.
  • In the same post, Trump denied a report that he had offered JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon the position of Federal Reserve chairman months earlier during a White House meeting.
President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened to sue JPMorgan Chase over allegedly “debanking” him following the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

“I’ll be suing JPMorgan Chase over the next two weeks for incorrectly and inappropriately DEBANKING me after the January 6th Protest, a protest that turned out to be correct for those doing the protesting,” Trump said in a social media post. “The Election was RIGGED!”

“While we won’t get specific about a client, we don’t close accounts because of political beliefs,” said JPMorgan spokesperson Trish Wexler. “We appreciate that this Administration has moved to address political debanking and we support those efforts.”

More:

 
Well, good on him.

I couldn't sue. Guess a plain-old Deplorable customer wasn't important enough to have Standing in a court.

I wish nothing but everlasting Hell to every lost-soul working at that den of iniquity...
 

Trump sues Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase over debanking the suit calls ‘political’​

  • President Donald Trump sued JPMorgan Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, for closing his and related entities’ accounts in early 2021 in what the lawsuit says were political actions.
  • The lawsuit, which seeks at least $5 billion in damages, was filed in state court in Miami-Dade County, Florida.
  • “While we regret President Trump has sued us, we believe the suit has no merit,” JPMorgan said.
President Donald Trump sued JPMorgan Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, on Thursday for closing accounts belonging to Trump and related entities in early 2021, in what the lawsuit calls political actions.

The closures came on the heels of the Jan. 6, 2021, riot by Trump supporters at the U.S. Capitol, and Trump exiting the White House later that same month after his electoral loss to former President Joe Biden was confirmed.

More:

 
Back
Top Bottom