Privacy, encryption vs. Surveillance state

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Anyway... I posted the above because it struck me: Culture shock. <-- We are undergoing totally radical changes in absolutely everything we have known.

Generals in drag with long hair and lipstick. Satanist school readings to kids. Breakdown of social mores. Inflation at the razor edge. Open knowledge of presidential treason. COVID. FBI/DOJ/CIA/MSM treason. Blatant, proven vote fraud.

A full list would take too much attention span. The above partial list has all hit us in a fashion equivalent to a volcano -- ALL AT ONCE in an unrelenting series of concussions... and being numbed by it, we are accepting it.

Look yourself in the mirror and ask the person you see: "What will you actually do if the only transactions you can make are to be made with electric dots?"

Remember: Taxes, insurance (for sure), any banking at all anywhere (fed)...
 
You mean kind of like a, "great reset"?
 
You mean kind of like a, "great reset"?
Frankly, it looks like a "great catastrophe" is more likely.

Remember: All of this is in the arena of WWIII, horrible disease forever in the human race, collapse of the USD, and a long litany of super-negative "first evers" too discouraging to list.
 
About 4 years ago, there a murder in the city of Tampa's Ybor city area right under one of their surveillance cameras and they actually said in the local news that they were unable to identify who did the crime other that is was a possible human.

Really makes a person feel safe doesn't it.

They was also doing facial recognition at the airports. I asked the cop who was doing it if he or they found anything. I was told to move along.

I never an answer to my question if a terrorist was supposed to register with the country. One of the local wits questioned (when Tampa was hosting a super bowl) as to why only ticket holders were monitored for warrants and crimes and not the players.
 
On another note is there technology out there that is similar to white noise boxes that nullify eavesdropping apparatus that will block random cameras emplaced by the authorities. Just wondering asking for a friend.
 
The people idiots who keep electing representatives that do nothing but work on ways to erode their Rights.

Seeing as how they keep doing it, they must like it.



On another note is there technology out there that is similar to white noise boxes that nullify eavesdropping apparatus that will block random cameras emplaced by the authorities. Just wondering asking for a friend.
Yes. See post #64. So far, it's prolly the best option.

There is something similar for cars, but built into a license plate frame in order to thwart automated license plate readers.
 
EFF does good work on this issue:

 
Supposedly one of the negotiations of the Republicans is they want protections for Crypto as part of the deal to raise the debt ceiling. Do not know if that is true.
Dang!! You hit it!

If they switch to crypto... there literally is NO LIMIT!

Ukraine needs fifty billion? One keystroke.
 
On another note is there technology out there that is similar to white noise boxes that nullify eavesdropping apparatus that will block random cameras emplaced by the authorities. Just wondering asking for a friend.
Here's something new on that front.

Clothes that make you invisible to cameras.

Well, sort of.

Interesting concept though.

How long it'll work? Who knows.


 
SAN FRANCISCO—An Oakland activist has dealt a blow to the near-total immunity the United States government and federal officials enjoy from lawsuits seeking accountability for their unlawful conduct. Activist and entrepreneur René Quiñonez will get his day in court, after a federal district judge partially rejected the government’s effort to dismiss his challenge to the Postal Service’s baseless seizure and search of hundreds of packages during the summer 2020 protests against police violence. René and the Institute for Justice (IJ) first filed this lawsuit in June 2022.

“We don’t surrender our right to privacy by using the postal service. All government officials must respect the Fourth Amendment, and the courts must hold them and their employers accountable when they overreach,” said IJ Attorney Jaba Tsitsuashvili. “Protection against the seizure and search of Mr. Quiñonez’s quintessentially political messages is exactly why we have these constitutional safeguards.”

 

Maryland Supreme Court: Police Can’t Search Digital Data When Users Revoke Consent​

Under the Fourth Amendment, police can search your home, your computer, and other private spaces without a warrant or even probable cause if you freely and voluntarily consent to the search. But even when someone consents to a search, they should be able to change their mind. Say, for example, if a lawyer gives them better advice. But as a recent case from the Maryland Supreme Court demonstrates, searches of digital data stored on electronic devices raise unique questions about consent. If you consent to a search of your computer and police make a copy of the data on the computer, can they still examine that copy if you withdraw that consent? In State v. McDonnell, the Maryland Supreme Court sensibly answered no.

In June 2019, police officers visited Mr. McDonnell’s home and requested to search his home, computer, and phone as part of their investigation into the distribution of child pornography . Mr. McDonnell originally declined the search, but later signed a consent form allowing the agents to search his home and seize his phone and computer. The form included a clause stating that “I understand that I may withdraw my consent at any time.” After Mr. McDonnell’s electronics had been seized and their contents copied, but before the contents had been examined, Mr. McDonnell’s lawyer sent an email withdrawing consent to “the seizure of [Mr. McDonnell’s] laptop, or examination of its contents.” But agents searched the contents of the computer anyway. McDonnell moved to suppress the evidence that came from the search of his computer after he had revoked his consent.

More:

 

The U.K. Government Is Very Close To Eroding Encryption Worldwide​

The U.K. Parliament is pushing ahead with a sprawling internet regulation bill that will, among other things, undermine the privacy of people around the world. The Online Safety Bill, now at the final stage before passage in the House of Lords, gives the British government the ability to force backdoors into messaging services, which will destroy end-to-end encryption. No amendments have been accepted that would mitigate the bill’s most dangerous elements.

If it passes, the Online Safety Bill will be a huge step backwards for global privacy, and democracy itself. Requiring government-approved software in peoples’ messaging services is an awful precedent. If the Online Safety Bill becomes British law, the damage it causes won’t stop at the borders of the U.K.

More:

 

Will Browsers Be Required By Law To Stop You From Visiting Infringing Sites?​

Mozilla’s Open Policy & Advocacy blog has news about a worrying proposal from the French government:


 
"France is on the verge of forcing browsers to create a dystopian technical capability."

How is it that France gets to force that on everyone else?

F' France.
 

I almost put this in the AI thread, but knowing how embedded Palantir is with government database/surveillance systems, it raises some issues with data mining capabilities...



I can only imagine Palantir building an AI bridge between military drone systems and the NCTC's disposition matrix
 
Earlier this week, EFF joined the ACLU and 59 partner organizations to send a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer urging the Senate to reject the STOP CSAM Act. This bill threatens encrypted communications and free speech online ...

 
So yeah, about that report posted above (#30) about China's Draconian surveillance system...

Australia is just full of big brotherly love.

Australian job seekers could soon be able to store and share verified job skills and qualifications with employers through a newly announced National Digital Skills Passport. This passport would function as a digital ID for job qualifications. ...


h/t: https://www.pmbug.com/threads/the-lunatic-fringe-market-and-trade-chat.4019/post-80681
 
Regarding post #72 and the previous post, the EU is working on a parallel project:


 
Colorado's (state) Supreme Court lays a turd on the 4th Amendment:
More:

 

More:


As with qualified immunity, and civil asset forfeiture, sometimes the law makes no damn sense.
 
The Five Eyes are publicizing a narrative via 60 Minutes. I thought these peeps preferred to stay in the background.

 
From the UK:
More (long):

 

 
Regarding post #103 on the Euro Digital Identity Wallet:



I searched, but could not find any corroboration of the ZH/Remix claim about Adam Glapiński statements, but it seems to track with what I did find:
 

US govt pays AT&T to let cops search Americans' phone records – 'usually' without a warrant​

A senator has alleged that American law enforcement agencies snoop on US citizens and residents, seemingly without regard for the privacy provisions of the Fourth Amendment, under a secret program called the Hemisphere Project that allows police to conduct searches of trillions of phone records.

According to Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), these searches "usually" happen without warrants. And after more than a decade of keeping people — lawmakers included — in the dark about Hemisphere, Wyden wants the Justice Department to reveal information about what he called a "long-running dragnet surveillance program."

"I have serious concerns about the legality of this surveillance program, and the materials provided by the DoJ contain troubling information that would justifiably outrage many Americans and other members of Congress," Wyden wrote in a letter [PDF] to US Attorney General Merrick Garland.

More:


 
That sounds exactly like what Edward Snowden revealed except Snowden talked about AT&T selling the data to the NSA, not Barney Fife.
 


Looks like the bill is limited to airports. Would be nicer if it applied broadly to every place the TSA operates.
 
WASHINGTON, Dec 6 (Reuters) - Unidentified governments are surveilling smartphone users via their apps' push notifications, a U.S. senator warned on Wednesday.

In a letter to the Department of Justice, Senator Ron Wyden said foreign officials were demanding the data from Alphabet's (GOOGL.O) Google and Apple (AAPL.O). Although details were sparse, the letter lays out yet another path by which governments can track smartphones.

More:

 
A few years ago, Human Rights Watch had a detailed report on China's Draconian surveillance system. It sounds like China is now taking it to 12 (it was already at 11):
 

Pharmacies sharing medical data without police warrant: Congressional investigation​

A congressional investigation has discovered that law enforcement agencies have been accessing patient prescription records through pharmacies without warrants, with most people unaware that their private data is being handed over to authorities.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee, along with Democratic Reps. Pramila Jayapal (Wash.) and Sara Jacobs (Calif.) alerted the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of what they’ve uncovered.

More:

 

L.L. Bean tips the scales in state privacy fight​

In Maine, a new data-privacy law stirred up a surprising opponent — and shows the power of local-national business alliances.

12/18/2023 05:00 AM EST

Rep. Maggie O’Neil, a Maine legislator, wanted to give the state’s residents a strong set of new online privacy rights. She introduced a data-privacy bill in May — rebuffing a Meta lobbyist, who wanted her to get behind a more industry-friendly law.

Then L.L. Bean arrived.

In October, a lawyer for the venerable outdoor retailer appeared in the state Capitol to testify against her bill, saying its new privacy requirements would add unnecessary burdens for businesses. The company also sent a letter urging lawmakers to follow existing privacy regulations in other states, rather than carving out a new set of protections for Maine.

As one of Maine’s largest employers and best-known brands, the century-old L.L. Bean has significant clout in the state Capitol. It didn’t endorse a specific law, but its testimony aligned directly with a rival privacy bill supported by the tech industry — one that would give companies much more latitude to use, buy and sell data on consumers.

More:

 
I guess I won't be buying any L.L. Bean products then.
 
Surveilling the surveillance state...
More:

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…