The Lunatic Fringe - Market and Trade Chat

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

DXY Daily is pushing the top of a resistance zone here, one that might just be enough to stop it near term. This is the DXY over stonks and gold since the tightening began. Gold trading with and against the USD at certain points.

 
A Debt based system must ALWAYS expand in order to be able to pay interest. As soon as that stops it collapses.

Well there was a time when default and failure relieved the need to expand the money base to cover all debts. Remeber when bad ideas failed and good ideas won? Back in the bad old dayz?
 


A sign of disinflation. JPow likey.
 
Well there was a time when default and failure relieved the need to expand the money base to cover all debts. Remeber when bad ideas failed and good ideas won? Back in the bad old dayz?

That was back when the system is not nearing it's maximum expansion. Then the individual failures can be allowed and compartmentalized fairly easily and not threaten the entire system. That time appears over.
 
That was back when the system is not nearing it's maximum expansion. Then the individual failures can be allowed and compartmentalized fairly easily and not threaten the entire system. That time appears over.
Like back in the day when banks were 'merging' with 'other' banks....

"Merging with banks" sounds so much better than 'Banks that were insolvent'.
 
Like back in the day when banks were 'merging' with 'other' banks....

"Merging with banks" sounds so much better than 'Banks that were insolvent'.

It's more about the ability of the system to be able to pay off the debt. Eventually though, you run out of any expansion opportunities and the economy cannot keep expanding in order to be able to service that debt. As interest rates rise now it should pop this bubble pretty SOONtm.
 


Contagion fears for the banking sector...
 
Although I am holding PTGX with a 91.58% gain... Generally the Weekend Trend Trader system is getting Thrashed and Trashed this week.

[Like being boiled in oil.] #Next1000Trades
 
IWM - iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

This is the universe of stocks that WTT plays in.

[Check out that last weekly candlestick! Ouchie.]

 
U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Friday she’s tracking a number of banks as Silicon Valley Bank has faced major problems.
...



@2:28 mark...

 
FDIC formed a Bridge Bank to handle SVB:
 

 
So bank failure with possible contagion is GREAT NEWS!!

[cough.. cough..]
 
The contagion will go beyond banks. In fact, the larger, better capitalized banks will probably not feel this much.

The spread is going to be to all the companies that held their accounts at SVB. The majority of high tech companies in silicon valley have accounts there. Companies like Roku, Shopify, ZipRecruiter. They stand to lose a lot of money. Most will be unable to make their next payroll or debt service payments.

Real estate? What if your landlord has their accounts with SVB? Not a big deal, if you can still make your rent payments, right?
What happens when the landlord can't make their debt service/mortgage payments? When the building is eventually foreclosed on, what will happen to you? And don't expect to get your security deposit (into six digits in the case of high end real estate) back, as that was held at SVB too.

The contagion from this will spread far and wide.

(and yes, I posted the same thing in the SVB thread on the other site)
 
so, only 151 billion is uninsured. Not that much really when it comes to banks. A rounding error when it comes to fed gov. If they are deemed TBTF then 200 billion shows up on their books by Monday. If not then depositors take a hit.
 

Scrutiny Falls on $43B USDC Stablecoin’s Cash Reserves at Failed Silicon Valley Bank​


Circle’s USDC, the second-largest stablecoin, with $43 billion market capitalization, held an undisclosed part of its $9.8 billion cash reserves at failed Silicon Valley Bank.

By Krisztian Sandor

Mar 10, 2023 at 12:35 p.m. MST
Updated Mar 10, 2023 at 6:11 p.m. MST


(Sandali Handagama/CoinDesk)



Jenny Johnson
President and CEO
Franklin Templeton
Jenny will discuss developing crypto-linked investment products in a bear market, the mood among her clients and her lon...
Secure Your Seat

U.S.-based stablecoin issuer Circle held a part of its USDC stablecoin’s cash reserves at Silicon Valley Bank as of Jan. 17, according to the firm's latest attestation.
USDC is the second-largest stablecoin on the market, with a $43 billion circulating supply that is fully backed by government bonds and cash-like assets.
Read More: USDC Stablecoin Depegs From $1; Circle Says Operations Are Normal


BTC$20,476.32
2.28%

ETH$1,469.69
3.46%

BNB$280.24
2.36%

XRP$0.37073142
0.20%

APT$10.67
5.77%


View All Prices

According to Circle’s January reserve report, the firm held some $9.88 billion of cash deposited at regulated banks to back USDC’s value. According to Circle's website on March 10, cash deposits in the reserves amounted to $11.1 billion.
USDC’s banking partners included Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the California-based bank that was taken over by regulators and shut down on Friday.
The full list of banks that held cash for Circle’s USDC are Bank of New York Mellon, Citizens Trust Bank, Customers Bank, New York Community Bank (a division of Flagstar Bank, N.A.), Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate Bank. Circle also keeps some part of USDC reserves in a dedicated BlackRock fund.
Circle said last week it had cut ties with Silvergate Bank, the crypto-friendly bank that halted operations and said it would “voluntarily liquidate” its assets earlier this week.
Signature Bank’s holding company’s (SI) shares have dropped 12% on the news about SVB’s shutdown. Signature said in December that it would reduce deposits tied to crypto firms by as much as $10 billion.


Circle spokesperson said late Friday that SBV was one of the six banks that the firm used "for managing the approximately 25% portion of USDC reserves held in cash."
"While we await clarity on how the FDIC receivership of Silicon Valley Bank will impact its depositors, Circle and USDC continue to operate normally," according to the statement.
Simon Dixon, CEO of online investment platform BnkToTheFuture, tweeted that Circle's chief executive Jeremy Allaire said the firm held "most of their cash is in BNY Melon," while sharing a screenshot from March 2. BnkToTheFuture is an investor and shareholder in Circle.
The recent failure of crypto- and tech-focused banks investors has rattled investors, causing crypto markets to crash. Bitcoin (BTC), the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, fell below the psychologically important $20,000 level, the lowest since January.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…