No banks are safe (bail ins, FDIC limits, systemic risks)

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

You wanna know how bad things really are? This is a good interview with an Expert on debt. It all comes down to the scams that have grown out of the old ratings agencies.

 
searcher said:
Locally

Press Release: Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Philadelphia Assumes All Deposits of Tioga-Franklin Savings Bank, Philadelphia - PRESS RELEASE | AUGUST 21, 2026 Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Philadelphia Assumes All Deposits of Tioga-Franklin Savings Bank, Philadelphia ...
Click to expand...
How does an institution (Any American bank) that has the power to LEND money into existence...go broke?

This stinks like politics. Like Barry Hussein's Grand Plan of putting those pesky little Building-and-Loans out of business, because, in his divine opinion, we had "too many" banks.

Too many to easily corrupt, he meant, of course. But one by one the neighborhood banks got stomped, shut-down, force-merged into WF or JPMC or BA...and this trend continues.

Soon they'll start attacking the credit unions. Already there's a merger-mania in my region over THOSE.
 
searcher said:
Update.

‘I have no money’: Thousands of Americans see their savings vanish in Synapse fintech crisis​

  • Thousands of Americans will receive little or nothing from savings accounts that were locked during the collapse of fintech middleman Synapse.
  • Customers believed the accounts were backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
  • CNBC spoke to a dozen customers caught in the predicament, people who have lost sums ranging from $7,000 to well over $200,000.
  • While there’s not yet a full tally of those left shortchanged, at fintech Yotta alone, 13,725 customers say they are being offered a combined $11.8 million despite putting in $64.9 million in deposits.
For 15 years, former Texas schoolteacher Kayla Morris put every dollar she could save into a home for her growing family.

When she and her husband sold the house last year, they stowed away the proceeds, $282,153.87, in what they thought of as a safe place — an account at the savings startup Yotta held at a real bank.

More:

www.cnbc.com

'I have no money': Thousands of Americans see their savings vanish in Synapse fintech crisis

CNBC spoke to a dozen customers caught in the Synapse fintech predicament, people who are owed sums ranging from $7,000 to well over $200,000.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
Click to expand...

Update

searcher

Post in thread 'FDIC insured savings account plus lottery (USA only)'

Update

www.bankingdive.com

Synapse victims look to small-claims court

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has allocated more funds to repay fintech users harmed in the Synapse crisis. But there’s no timeline for when that money would be disbursed.
www.bankingdive.com www.bankingdive.com
 
Just a look back in time.

How People Got Their Money After the 1933 Bank Closures​

When Franklin D. Roosevelt closed all banks in the U.S. in March 1933, it was part of a nationwide bank holiday ordered to stop panic withdrawals and give the government time to stabilize the system Wikipedia+1. For a week, Americans could not withdraw cash, make deposits, or transfer funds Federal Reserve History.

Immediate solution: reopening solvent banks
The Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933 authorized the Federal Reserve to issue new currency backed by “good assets” so that banks found solvent by federal examiners could reopen Wikipedia+1. The Treasury inspected each bank, reopened those that were financially sound, reorganized others, and closed insolvent ones Wikipedia. Once reopened, people could withdraw their deposits and resume normal banking.

Before reopening: alternative ways to access funds
During the closure, many people relied on checks, credit, and payment slips to continue transactions UW Departments Web Server. Businesses and individuals used:

  • Checks drawn on other banks that remained open or on the Federal Reserve’s own currency.
  • Credit arrangements with merchants who extended short-term credit.
  • Cash held at home for those who had saved it before the panic.
  • Barter and local credit networks in some communities UW Departments Web Server.
Government and Federal Reserve actions
The Federal Reserve distributed new currency from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to ensure reopened banks could meet legitimate withdrawals Federal Reserve History. Roosevelt’s first Fireside Chat (March 12, 1933) reassured the public that it was “safer to keep your money in a reopened bank than under the mattress” Federal Reserve History.

In summary:
People did not lose their money permanently. The government’s rapid inspection and selective reopening of banks, combined with temporary alternative payment methods, allowed most depositors to regain access to their funds once the banking system was stabilized Wikipedia+2.
 
www.bankingdive.com

3 takeaways from stress test changes and a new SVB review

Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman outlined three potential changes to stress-test calculations and an assessment of the central bank’s performance amid the 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
www.bankingdive.com www.bankingdive.com

www.bankingdive.com

State regulators float AI framework for banks, examiners

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors issued discretionary guidance that proposes eight questions examiners should consider and three tiers of risk banks face by using artificial intelligence.
www.bankingdive.com www.bankingdive.com
 
www.sovereignmagazine.com

Nano Banc: 2026's Largest US Bank Failure So Far

California closed Nano Banc on Sept. 25, 2026. The FDIC puts the cost at $114 million, the most of any US bank failure this year. What depositors need to know.
www.sovereignmagazine.com www.sovereignmagazine.com

www.fdic.gov

Sunwest Bank Assumes All Deposits and Certain Assets of Nano Banc, Irvine, California | FDIC.gov

Nano Banc of Irvine, California was closed today by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the FDIC as receiver.
www.fdic.gov www.fdic.gov
 
the story is still unfolding, but paraguay just watched its 5th largest bank go under overnight

ueno bank had 2.94 million clients and ₲17.3 trillion in deposits, about $2.9 billion.

in a country of 7 million people, that's nearly half the population locked out of their accounts. cards, transfers, everything frozen

in march, ueno reported a 15% capital ratio against a 12% minimum. on paper it was fine

then regulators actually looked at the loan book. the bank had been lending to companies tied to its own owners "a sola firma", on a signature, with no collateral and no real credit analysis.

when the central bank told it to clean that up, other companies took out new loans to pay down the insider debt. same money going in a circle

once inspectors traced the money, the losses got recognized. capital went from 15% to below half the legal minimum

and the worst part: the single biggest depositor is IPS, paraguay's national pension fund, with about $290 million. roughly $850 million of public money is stuck inside

deposit insurance covers ₲228 million per person, about $38K. everything above that is now a claim against a failed bank

the central bank says this is "an isolated case" and not a problem with the system
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom